Review



meg and eeg measurement system  (Elekta)

 
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 90
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    Elekta meg and eeg measurement system
    ( a ) shows Maximal Intensity Projections (MIPs), together with a rendering on the ventral cortical surface of a standard brain in Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) space, of voxels where faces produced significantly greater power between 0–32 Hz and 0–800 ms than scrambled faces across participants, after simultaneously localising both the <t>EEG</t> <t>and</t> <t>MEG</t> data, and thresholding to correct for multiple comparisons using random field theory. Note the bilateral ventral and right lateral occipitotemporal clusters (see text). ( b ) shows the corresponding results for the same statistical test on the fMRI data. ( c ) shows where familiar faces produced greater BOLD response than unfamiliar faces at P <0.001 uncorrected. ( d ) shows where faces produced greater source-localised power than scrambled faces after using the major fMRI clusters from ( b ) to inform the localisation of the EEG and MEG data (see text).
    Meg And Eeg Measurement System, supplied by Elekta, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/meg+and+eeg+measurement+system/meg+and+eeg+measurement+system/pmc04412149-79-4-15
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    meg and eeg measurement system - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "A multi-subject, multi-modal human neuroimaging dataset"

    Article Title: A multi-subject, multi-modal human neuroimaging dataset

    Journal: Scientific Data

    doi: 10.1038/sdata.2015.1

    ( a ) shows Maximal Intensity Projections (MIPs), together with a rendering on the ventral cortical surface of a standard brain in Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) space, of voxels where faces produced significantly greater power between 0–32 Hz and 0–800 ms than scrambled faces across participants, after simultaneously localising both the EEG and MEG data, and thresholding to correct for multiple comparisons using random field theory. Note the bilateral ventral and right lateral occipitotemporal clusters (see text). ( b ) shows the corresponding results for the same statistical test on the fMRI data. ( c ) shows where familiar faces produced greater BOLD response than unfamiliar faces at P <0.001 uncorrected. ( d ) shows where faces produced greater source-localised power than scrambled faces after using the major fMRI clusters from ( b ) to inform the localisation of the EEG and MEG data (see text).
    Figure Legend Snippet: ( a ) shows Maximal Intensity Projections (MIPs), together with a rendering on the ventral cortical surface of a standard brain in Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) space, of voxels where faces produced significantly greater power between 0–32 Hz and 0–800 ms than scrambled faces across participants, after simultaneously localising both the EEG and MEG data, and thresholding to correct for multiple comparisons using random field theory. Note the bilateral ventral and right lateral occipitotemporal clusters (see text). ( b ) shows the corresponding results for the same statistical test on the fMRI data. ( c ) shows where familiar faces produced greater BOLD response than unfamiliar faces at P <0.001 uncorrected. ( d ) shows where faces produced greater source-localised power than scrambled faces after using the major fMRI clusters from ( b ) to inform the localisation of the EEG and MEG data (see text).

    Techniques Used: Produced

    Related Articles

    Produced:

    Article Title: A multi-subject, multi-modal human neuroimaging dataset
    Article Snippet: Both the MEG and EEG were measured in a light magnetically shielded room using an Elekta Neuromag Vectorview 306 system (Helsinki, FI).



    Similar Products

    meg/eeg latency measures  (MathWorks Inc)
    90
    MathWorks Inc meg/eeg latency measures
    Article part of the special issue by order of publication date.
    Meg/Eeg Latency Measures, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/meg+and+eeg+measurement+system/pmc09043239-18-0-35
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    meg/eeg latency measures - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    meg and eeg measurement system  (Elekta)
    90
    Elekta meg and eeg measurement system
    ( a ) shows Maximal Intensity Projections (MIPs), together with a rendering on the ventral cortical surface of a standard brain in Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) space, of voxels where faces produced significantly greater power between 0–32 Hz and 0–800 ms than scrambled faces across participants, after simultaneously localising both the <t>EEG</t> <t>and</t> <t>MEG</t> data, and thresholding to correct for multiple comparisons using random field theory. Note the bilateral ventral and right lateral occipitotemporal clusters (see text). ( b ) shows the corresponding results for the same statistical test on the fMRI data. ( c ) shows where familiar faces produced greater BOLD response than unfamiliar faces at P <0.001 uncorrected. ( d ) shows where faces produced greater source-localised power than scrambled faces after using the major fMRI clusters from ( b ) to inform the localisation of the EEG and MEG data (see text).
    Meg And Eeg Measurement System, supplied by Elekta, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/meg+and+eeg+measurement+system/meg+and+eeg+measurement+system/pmc04412149-79-4-15
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    meg and eeg measurement system - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Article part of the special issue by order of publication date.

    Journal: Frontiers in Neuroscience

    Article Title: Editorial: From Raw MEG/EEG to Publication: How to Perform MEG/EEG Group Analysis With Free Academic Software

    doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.854471

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Article part of the special issue by order of publication date.

    Article Snippet: Estimating the Timing of Cognitive Operations With MEG/EEG Latency Measures: A Primer, a Brief Tutorial, and an Implementation of Various Methods , Liesefeld , GitHub , , EEG/ MEG , Timing of cognitive operations , MATLAB , Fieldtrip , Yes (HW).

    Techniques: Software, Functional Assay, Biomarker Discovery, Activity Assay, Selection, Imaging

    ( a ) shows Maximal Intensity Projections (MIPs), together with a rendering on the ventral cortical surface of a standard brain in Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) space, of voxels where faces produced significantly greater power between 0–32 Hz and 0–800 ms than scrambled faces across participants, after simultaneously localising both the EEG and MEG data, and thresholding to correct for multiple comparisons using random field theory. Note the bilateral ventral and right lateral occipitotemporal clusters (see text). ( b ) shows the corresponding results for the same statistical test on the fMRI data. ( c ) shows where familiar faces produced greater BOLD response than unfamiliar faces at P <0.001 uncorrected. ( d ) shows where faces produced greater source-localised power than scrambled faces after using the major fMRI clusters from ( b ) to inform the localisation of the EEG and MEG data (see text).

    Journal: Scientific Data

    Article Title: A multi-subject, multi-modal human neuroimaging dataset

    doi: 10.1038/sdata.2015.1

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( a ) shows Maximal Intensity Projections (MIPs), together with a rendering on the ventral cortical surface of a standard brain in Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) space, of voxels where faces produced significantly greater power between 0–32 Hz and 0–800 ms than scrambled faces across participants, after simultaneously localising both the EEG and MEG data, and thresholding to correct for multiple comparisons using random field theory. Note the bilateral ventral and right lateral occipitotemporal clusters (see text). ( b ) shows the corresponding results for the same statistical test on the fMRI data. ( c ) shows where familiar faces produced greater BOLD response than unfamiliar faces at P <0.001 uncorrected. ( d ) shows where faces produced greater source-localised power than scrambled faces after using the major fMRI clusters from ( b ) to inform the localisation of the EEG and MEG data (see text).

    Article Snippet: Both the MEG and EEG were measured in a light magnetically shielded room using an Elekta Neuromag Vectorview 306 system (Helsinki, FI).

    Techniques: Produced